Metal Additive Manufacturing Optimized Via Simulation Solution

Category Description Goes Here. Category Description Goes Here. Category Description Goes Here.

Log In);

The latest engineering related news and articles from around the world.

Designer Edge);





3D Printing);







Discover and do projects you care about with support from our network of over 1.5 million technical minds.



Start New);

Discover thousands of jobs in engineering around the world.




Informative and educational webinars, tutorials, technical papers and videos for engineers.





Challenging games and puzzles for the engineering mind.

Top Games);


Eng-tips for engineering professionals


Tek-Tips for computer professionals

Category Description Goes Here. Category Description Goes Here. Category Description Goes Here.

Log In);

Metal Additive Manufacturing Optimized Via Simulation Solution

Shawn Wassermanposted on May 28, 201520268 views

The growth of additive manufacturing (3D printing) in industry is due, in part, to its ability to produce increasingly complex customized products.

Laser direct metal deposition additive manufacturing model. Courtesy of ESI and University of Manchester.

With a single piece of equipment, powder and a CAD file, companies can decentralize their production and prototyping. Additionally, 3D printers have the ability to build products that cannot be made with traditional manufacturing processes.

However, the lack of standardization, design rules, repeatability, production speed and quality control significantly hinders the expansion of 3D printing, notes Mustafa Megahed, manager of CFD & Multiphysics Centre of Excellence atESI Group.

Simulating additive manufacturing mechanisms can go a long way to help bring 3D printing to the next level. Additive manufacturing technologies such as laser direct metal deposition (LDMD or blown powder additive manufacturing) involve the modelling of microscopic, mesoscopic and macroscopic scales.

When simulating LDMD, you are dealing with particles in the order of 10 microns in diameter, a laser beam diameter of 1-2 mm, a work piece several centimeters long and a laser path that could be as long as a kilometer, stressed Megahed.

If you were to simulate that all at once, he added, it would take more computing power than current high performance computing (HPC) could handle.

This multi-scale problem can be a challenge to simulate. Fortunately, ESI Group has developed a multi-scale, multiphysics solution to characterize the physics associated with additive manufacturing processes.

Powder stream simulation and deposition patterns based on nozzle substrate distances (a close, b focused, c far). Courtesy of ESI and University of Manchester.

A laser focused through the central hull of the nozzle acts as the heat source. It melts the metal substrate and particles so they combine into a melt pool. The melt pool beads onto the substrate due to the surface tension forces.

The particles are dispersed from the outer ring of the nozzle. A carrier gas blows out of the ring and releases the metal powder onto the substrate. Particles that do not get hot enough to join the melt pool will impinge and bounce off of the substrate surface as material and energy losses.

Nozzle-to-substrate distance, to control particle deposition pattern

Laser speeds, to control the melt pool

Material properties of the final product.

Simulating a Multi-Scale Problem Like an LDMD 3D Printer

Comparison of thermal distribution and powder in-flight. Simulation has good correlation to reality. Courtesy of ESI and University of Manchester.

The particle flow is modeled using Lagrangian tracking and the laser is simulated by the control angle discrete ordinate model. The model was extended to account for laser interaction with the particles (scattering and absorption).

To simplify the computation, interaction between particles is ignored in-flight. The research teams atESIand the University of Manchester found a middle ground between experimentally-measured powder particle temperatures and numerical predictions.

The micro scale simulation is used to optimize the nozzle and process parameters to influence the melt pool shape, avoiding porosities or build defects. The thermal cycle is obtained as a by-product and is utilized in macro-models to determine the corresponding residual stresses, explained Megahed.

The results of the micro scale model will feed into the macro scale model. This simulation will determine the residual stresses and distortions created as the melt pool cools and solidifies.

The distortion is certainly not wanted because the final shape might not match the original design, said Megahed. Also, the residual stresses represent an internal load, leading to reduced load capacity of the material. These imperfections will also accumulate as the model builds and sections are heated and cooled multiple times.

The mesoscale model looks into the overall metallurgical properties of the build. The results will be dependent on the alloy composition, temperature distribution, deposition patterns and residuals. Therefore, the micro and macro simulations interacts with the mesoscale model. Today, ESIs CFD & Multiphysics Centre of Excellence uses metallurgical tools and data bases from their established metal-based manufacturing tools, such as ESIs casting simulation suite, ProCAST, to generate these results.

Megahed has demonstrated that solvers, databases and capabilities of ESIs end-to-end solutions can be used to simulate the additive manufacturing processes. The ongoing research effort will lead to a suite of tools dedicated to additive manufacturing and its unique modeling needs.

But within Megaheds words there might be a hint to the future of theESI Groupand 3D printing. ESI Group has a tendency to package their technologies together into industry-specific design tools that enable end-to-end virtual prototyping. Examples of this includesHVACmetal stampingand evenaircraft seats.

Given this knowledge and Megaheds mention of a workflow construction, it would not be surprising to see an additive manufacturing equipment design tool sometime in the near future. In the meantime, ESI Group does offer customer assistance to use their currently available tools to simulate additive manufacturing.

To learn more about ESI Groups simulation technologies, followthis link.

ESI Group has sponsored this post. They have no editorial input. All opinions are mine. Shawn Wasserman

Engineering Simulation Software in 2018 and Beyond

What is the Digital Twin and Why Should Simulation and IoT Experts Care?

7 Questions to Ask CAE Vendors of Structural Analysis and Simulation Software

Simulation Boom Stalls. CAE Experts Needed to Make Engineering Apps

The Real-World Cost of a 3D-Printed Prototype

Engineering Design Platforms and Simulation in-CAD Benefit Product Development Teams

How to Design the Lightest Possible Bike And Still Sleep at Night

Why Engineering Apps? Ask Altair, ANSYS, Autodesk, Dassault, Siemens and COMSOL

Choosing the Right Turbulence Model for Your CFD Simulation

Current Overview of Simulation Technology

Employing CAD Blocks Effectively in Everyday Design

Whats the Right Workstation for SOLIDWORKS?